1. Submit manuscript and
receive acknowledgement of receipt.
2. Your essay will be reviewed
by each member of the Editorial Board after the
stated deadline on the CFP.
3. The board will meet and
have an initial poll of votes according to a
model of : "yes," "no," "revise and resubmit."
The poll will include a brief statement by each
editor in support of their vote.
4. If decisions are not
unanimous during intial vote, the board will
discuss essay in depth with the goal of reaching
5. If consensus cannot be
reached, we will vote according to majority
rule. Editors with minority votes will have
final say as to whether the majority decision as
written is acceptable to them. If it is not
acceptable we will continue to discuss the
manuscript until acceptability is reached.
6. You will be informed of the
decision of the board.
We are committed to working
with authors whose work fits within the
framework of the e-journal and/or the theme of
the edition in question. We will work in
conversation with all authors for the best
outcomes possible. We understand that the desire
to maintain authortial voice may some times
superseded the confines of the e-journal format.
Any questions, concerns, etc. will be answered
and discussion amongst all participants strongly
Upon request, we will provide
feedback in the following format: 1. vote: #
yes, # no, # revise and resubmit, 2. overall
comments of entire board reflecting our
consensus/majority discussion, 3. itemized
comments from each reviewer listed as reviewer
1, reviewer 2, etc.
Due to the labor and
technological constraints involved in publishing
an e-journal we can no longer accept submissions
that are not in print ready quality for review.
Any rejected submissions will
be destroyed using bleaching software.
If you have any questions
Questions will be discussed amongst the entire
board prior to your receiving an answer.